The lines in racing are evident and precise. At tomorrow’s Diamond League Adidas Grand Prix in New York City lines will define the arc of competition while designating starts and finishes. If only life could be so simply striped.
Events around the globe have been effected by the bombings at the Boston Marathon this past April 15th. And there is little doubt that these next ten months will be daunting for the Boston Athletic Association as they determine where to draw their own lines for Patriot’s Day 2014.
Yesterday, May 23rd, in his War on Terror policy re-set speech at the National Defense University in Virginia, President Obama brought up Boston as he enunciated the qualities which define America and which require, in his words, “efforts to refine, and ultimately repeal, the AUMF’s mandate.” (Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Terrorists)
“I think of the runner planning to do the 2014 Boston Marathon who said, ‘Next year you’re going to have more people than ever’,” said Mr. Obama, declaring no war can go on indefinitely. “Determination is not something to be messed with. That’s who the American people are, determined, and not to be messed with.”
If that is true of Americans in general, it is even more so the definition of marathoners, regardless of their country of origin. Events throughout the running world have pledged support for the One Fund Boston, and there have already been calls for the BAA to open up the 2014 Boston Marathon like they did for the 100th anniversary race in 1996 when over 38,000 runners were allowed to participate. And the townspeople of Hopkinton, Massachusetts, the sleepy bedroom community which serves as the starting area for the marathon, have come to an early understanding that 2014 will be a special year regardless of the Day of the Locusts their town might be turned into.
This past weekend I was in Cleveland for the 36th Rite Aid Cleveland Marathon & 10K. 22,000 runners came together to celebrate fitness, pledge allegiance to the fallen at Boston, and salute the freedom that America represents. But what I also witnessed was a show of security that gave one both pause and comfort as the two forces of freedom and security sought equilibrium in these contentious days of pride and fear.
Cuyahoga County Sheriff Frank Bova told WKYC-TV3 that this year they had a new “impact unit” in the crowd for the marathon, a unit made up of 12 deputies who were ready for a large-scale emergency response. And at the weekend expo at Cleveland’s International Exposition Center, a new bag policy was implemented that had officers checking every purse and backpack that came into the building, and required all backpacks to be checked before entering the expo area. Is widespread TSA-screening the world of the future in the land of the free?
The week after Boston I was in London for their marathon, and while their response was robust in light of the Boston bombings, a 40% increase in security, what was publicly visible was only the minute of silence before the start, a suitably British understatement. Yet in Cleveland the appearance of security was highly visible, not just in the form of regular police, but in the tactically outfitted military-like special forces that patrolled the start finish area around FirstEnergy Stadium, home to the Cleveland Browns.
There are thousands of road races around the country each year. It is still too early to determine if what happened in Boston will fundamentally change the nature of these freedom festivals, or if our public response might, in a paradoxical way, make a case that reinforces the actions of ones like the brothers Tsarnaev in Boston.
“See how we can make them jump?”
Is there a case to be made to ignore the grand gesture as a means to reduce the likelihood of similar return? Where is that line between freedom and security? By building up our response do we reinforce the threat?
Therein lies the great challenge. Though the simple act of running strips us of the social, political, and economic encumbrances that may separate us, and therefore grants those who in engage in the act an insight into our commonality, not every man is a runner. Nor does every man seek to sew with the common thread. Some men revel in the otherness of their plight, even as we runners of the pre-Boom era once did when very few undertook distance against time upon foot.
There is no doubt that an ever-increasing world population drawn closer closer by technological advances while competing for limited resources will, like tectonic plates beneath the earth’s crust, generate a correspondingly greater friction. But on top of that we live in an era when the historical ends of colonialism, imperialism, and the Cold War have set free once-clamped down populations. And any such release comes with deep-seeded feelings of frustration and bitter self-righteousness that can lead to an indiscriminate lashing out. Just as beauty is in the eye of the beholder, so, too are envy, comeuppance and retribution.
There is a fine distinction between the role of a super-power and becoming the symbol which defines historical arcs, as our own Don’t Tread on Me beginning was a retreat away from exactly those same restrictive forces.
Just as the New York Road Runners’ best intentions were lost in the wake of Hurricane Sandy when the New York City Marathon became the symbol for the fear and frustrations released by the storm, so too is America’s righteous self-defense – after all, who attacked whom on 9/11? – too often misread even as our size, high-tech weapons and mission over-reach make us more likely to bear the brunt of a changing world’s frustration and calumny. Thus, while President Obama defended the use of drones in the ongoing war on Al Qaeda, he also reminded us, “we must define the nature and scope of this struggle or else it will define us.”
Running has been called the great democratizer, as all men are given an equal opportunity at the start and only separated by talent, training, and racing desire by the finish. Where we draw the lines between one another and our guests at our races may well be a leading indicator of how we respond beyond our shores, as well.
5 thoughts on “THE LINE”
Good article!We will be linking to this great article onn our site.
Keep up the great writing.
Have you ever thought about publishing an ebook or guest authoring on other
sites? I have a blog based upon on the same subjects you discuss and would love to have you share some
stories/information. I know my audience
would enjoy your work. If you’re even remotely interested, feel free to shoot me an email.
If you would like to obtain much from this
post then you have to apply these methods to your won webpage.
Toni: Having just finished a few weeks of extensive interviews with race directors for an article I wrote for the latest issue of Road Race Management, I can tell you that this is what we may expect going forward at most races, and then again, maybe not. Some race directors refused to even speak with me regarding their security measures, despite the fact that I pointed out to them that potential evil-doers, aren’t reading Road Race Management on a regular basis, while others were more than willing to discuss what additional security precautions they are implementing at their events, or have already put into place (several of the races went on just a few weeks after Boston) The two best comments I heard, which I included in the article were from Scott Dickey (Competitor) and Brant Kotch (Houston Marathon) Dickey said: “In the years to come we aren’t going to be saying that we’re living in a post-Boston Marathon/Patriot’s Day bombing world, we will always say that we’re living in a post-9/11 world.” And Kotch said: “I wouldn’t want something to happen at our event, have a lawsuit brought against us, and find myself sitting on the stand with an attorney asking me what we did after Boston to make our race safer, and having to say we didn’t do anything.” There you have it.
And so it goes…
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: Edward Parham, Director of Public Relations
Rueckert Advertising and Public Relations
Tel: (518) 446-1091
Albany Policy Department Announces New Security Measures for 5/31, 6/1 Freihofer’s Run for Women
ALBANY, NY (May 24, 2013) — In response to last month’s tragic events in Boston, the Albany Police Department (APD), in conjunction with various local, state, and federal agencies, announces the following new security measures will be in place Saturday, June 1st for the 35th anniversary Freihofer’s Run for Women (FRW):
* Backpacks/coolers/duffle bags will not be permitted at the race venue.
* Anything brought onsite, including runners’ items for FRW bag-check, must be transported in a clear plastic bag for easy inspection.
* No animals, dogs or domestic pets (with the exception of service dogs) will be allowed on-site due to the presence of police dog patrols.
* Photo identification is required.
* To avoid delays, plan to leave up to 30 minutes earlier to get down to the event site, as the Expo, which includes chip/bib pick up, has moved from the South Concourse to the Convention Hall.
“The safety of race participants, spectators, volunteers and residents remains our top priority,” said Albany Police Chief Steve Krokoff.
Toward that end, the APD is asking race participants, spectators and residents to be vigilant and report any suspicious activity. Anyone who sees suspicious activity is asked to call the event’s tips line at (518) 300-0570.
Motorists should note that Madison Avenue will be closed between Eagle and Swan Streets from 6 p.m. on Friday, May 31st through 3 p.m. on Saturday, June 1st.
Media calls regarding event security should be directed to the APD at (518) 889-9446.