In this current age, competition seems increasingly out of fashion as the old binary of winning and losing (like male and female) has been deemed, by some, to be fundamentally unsound. Winners evidently create losers, and somehow competition evokes separation and elitism.
Along that same arc, there are moments in Olympic lore that reflect the quality of sportsmanship that defines the Olympic movement as envisioned by the founder of the modern Games Baron Pierre de Coubertin.
In Rio 2016, it was America’s Abby D’Agostino helping New Zealand’s Nikki Hamblin up after both tumbled to the track after clipping heels in the 5000m, Abby saying to Nikki, “Get up. We have to finish this.”
Then, when it became obvious that D’Agostino was hurt, it was Hamblin who offered the American support and encouragement rather than running ahead.
For many, the men’s high jump final has been the most heartwarming story yet in the Tokyo Games of 2021.
After Qatar’s Mutaz Essa Barshim and Italy’s Gianmarco Tamberi cleared every bar all the way through 2.37 meters, both failed to clear 2.39m on all three attempts, thereby leaving them tied. After discussing their options with an official, both agreed to share the Olympic gold medal rather than extend the competition in a jump off, as is the usual protocol.
Yes, it was a touching moment, as the two have been friends since 2010 and have seen one another through good times and bad.
But isn’t true sportsmanship encouraging your opponent/friend to do his best, rather than encouraging him not to compete – and yet still get all the glory? As Abby D’Agostino said five years ago, “we have to finish this thing.”
Seeing the women long jump finalists encouraging one another on their sixth round jumps when all the medals were still up for grabs; watching the women gymnasts hugging their opponents following their rival’s routines when entire careers were on the line; and perhaps most famously, hearing how Germany’s Lutz Long suggested to America’s Jesse Owens that he move his starting mark back a few inches in the Olympic long jump in Berlin 1936 so Owens wouldn’t foul out of the competition – and thereby possibly costing Long a gold medal on home soil – those are examples of sportsmanship at the highest, Olympic level.
It’s not quite the same as saying “Can we have two golds?” as Barshim did when asked whether he would rather share a gold medal or go through a jump off with his Italian friend.
Yes, the old friends were happy for one another and the emotion of the moment touched us all, especially in these polarizing times. But isn’t the Olympics also about fair competition in an honorable setting? Why weren’t there seven bronze medals given out in the men’s singles golf competition? That’s how many men finished the 72-hole competition at 15-under par. Why did they have a playoff to determine the single bronze medal recipient? Why give out medals at all?
If Barshim and Tamberi wanted to tie, what would they have done if they were told it would be for equal silver medals, with the gold left open because they chose not to compete for it? Think they would’ve jumped at that option?
In any case, how was it their choice, anyway? Do we ask students whether they want to take final exams if you’re just going to give them an A grade just the same?
Yes, sportsmanship and participation are wonderful parts of the Olympic movement. In fact, the Olympic motto, Citius, Altius, Fortius, was slightly altered this year by IOC President Thomas Bach to include “Faster, Higher, Stronger….Together,” after a year when the world was kept far, far apart by the Covid-19 pandemic and the Olympics themselves were postponed.
But competition is just as honorable, too, like with Warholm v. Benjamin and McLaughlin v. Muhammad in the 400m hurdles. So let’s not confuse sportsmanship with soft landings and easy wins. BTW, I’m happy for both men.
12 thoughts on “SPORTSMANSHIP OR EASY GOLD?”
Won’t belabor the point, but I disagree with your take here Toni. Not like the podium was crowded with winners. 3 medalists, just like all the other events.
Everyone entitled to their own opinion. That’s the beauty of the format. Thanks for reading and responding.
Interesting take. I thought it was a beautiful moment. They did tie, and followed the rules for tie-breaking that allowed them to choose. Maybe in their minds a jump-off is an artificial and poor way to break a tie in an event that can lead to ties more than any other in T&F. If the top two men tied to the thousandth in the 100 meter dash, would you expect them to have a run-off?
They CHOSE not to compete for the gold medal. Remember when Allyson Felix and Jeneba Tarmoh tied for third in the 100m at the 2012 Olympic Trials? And how Tarmoh chose not to compete in a run-off? Felix got the Olympic slot. The sport is based on competition. Competition is why there is a sport. Thanks for contributing. TR
Amazing to have a discussion as to whether an event at the Olympics is actually a competition to be won or lost. And agreed, Toni, bizarre that they were even asked.
In a letter dated14 March 1538 from Thomas, Duke of Norfolk, to Thomas Cromwell, we see for the first time the adage “a man can not have his cake and eat his cake, too”. Evidently, that no longer holds true at the Tokyo Games of 2021.
Personaly, as a fan of the sport, I loved the sentiment of what I like to call the ‘Tokyo International High Jump Truce’.
As a historian of the sport, I’d like to draw your attention to the fact that a precedent for Olympic ‘medal sharing’ was set many Games ago…in 1936.
Here’s a little something that I wrote about incident: https://www.facebook.com/mike.fanelli/posts/10225154212858215?comment_id=10225154266299551¬if_id=1628105208976290¬if_t=feed_comment&ref=notif
I, too, love the 1936 pole vault saga. The key difference between that story and the high jump in Tokyo 2021 is that Nishida and Oe created their “Medals of Eternal Friendship” in 1936 back home after the officials in the sporting arena “unilaterally rejected: their request to share the silver medal. Instead, officials settled the competition via a tie-breaking count back on misses, leading to the medal operation back home in Japan. Ergo, if Messers Barshim and Tamberi wanted to create a similar Eternal Friendship medal back home, beautiful. But do it after either they, or the officials conduct the competition to completion in the arena first. As always, appreciate your thoughtful responses and exhibits from the T&F Garage.
“One man practicing sportsmanship is far better than a hundred teaching it”
– Knute Rockne
Sorry, but you’re ruining a beautiful moment and also over-thinking it. This wasn’t a case of “everyone’s a winner” because no one else cleared 2.37. There were *2* winners. Calling this a case of “everyone’s a winner” is a straw man argument. Argumentum ad absurdum.
Actually, 3 men cleared 2.37.
Maksim Nedasekau (Belarus) cleared, as well but had one miss at 2.35. So he took bronze. “Everyone” might not have been a winner, as such, but once there was more than one, you’re on the spectrum. And I imagine they didn’t stamp more than one gold ahead of time. Thanks for adding to the conversation.
I agree with you. Isn’t the idea of the Olympics all about competition at the highest level? I grew up in Plymouth MA and ran with my brother on almost every training run. We never finished together on the training runs or races, to me it would be an insult if he slowed down to let me finish with him. We are now fifty nine and sixty years old and still feel the same way. We are best of friends but have to much respect for each other to do what those gentlemen did.